NANO-LEVEL HIGH-RES LARA WOMAN PHOTOGRAPHY
Found these. Do not know if they are new or old. They must be quite new, as cameras have only recently been able to take photos this big. Can’t remember her name any more, either.
OK. Can remember her name again. Alison Carroll. Well done whoever cleverly renamed the image files “Alison_Carroll-UHQ_Pictures_001.jpg” and so on, so future generations of Google Image Search-ers know what she was called and who to look for more of.
Carroll with two Rs.
Just to warn you – this photoshoot includes a great costume change. She will soon be wearing less. They are about to wander off message.
Do not know who the original copyright holder is or where they came from.
Do not care. They’re here now. That’s what matters.
They might not be new, but they’re about to become used.
Is this costume part of the Tomb Raider “canon”?
She’s a representative of a video game character. This is allowed. This is fine. This is just what we all do.
filed in PROMOTIONAL IMAGES on Oct.08, 2009
October 8th, 2009 on 1:46 pm
Isn’t Lara Croft supposed to have unfeasibly large tits? I say we fire her unless she gets the necessary ‘udder-sized’ implants.
What? modelling ain’t unionised boys, and until it is, we can do what we damn well please to these girls. NOW FIND ME ONE OF THOSE NEW PRETEEN RECRUITS, IT’S TIME FOR A ‘PHOTOSHOOT WITHOUT CAMERAS’.
October 8th, 2009 on 2:09 pm
The best bit is that those are prop guns, meaning you can be as rude and perverted as you like, to her face, knowing she won’t actually be able to shoot you. Brilliant.
October 8th, 2009 on 2:23 pm
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Joachim Diaz. Joachim Diaz said: NANO-LEVEL HIGH-RES LARA WOMAN PHOTOGRAPHY http://bit.ly/45PVYI (via @UKRESISTANCE) […]
October 8th, 2009 on 3:01 pm
Is someone going to post a link to the images which are a little…er…close to the bone.
Go on then…
Crikey!
October 8th, 2009 on 3:24 pm
Big tits, big tits, big tits, big tits, big tits, bi . . . ? Where the big tits go?! It was all a scam on my libido.
That’s not nice.
October 8th, 2009 on 3:31 pm
Thanks Captain Whoops. We now know that she has a spray tan. And I find that crotch shot a bit disturbing.
Also, Having been fooled into thinking that Alison had enormous knockers, and finding out that they are rather small, I feel cheated and will never trust my own eyes again.
October 8th, 2009 on 3:47 pm
As long as the boobs aren’t fake I’m quite happy. I hate the stretched and veiny look implants give.
The high resolution of the photos does reveal a lot of hair all over her face and chest. I’ve not been close enough to a real woman, is this normal?
October 8th, 2009 on 3:59 pm
Oh, we all knew about the spraytan from seeing that pic before. Were you asleep?
If you’re feeling short-changed on the knockers front, just ask Google about Gianna Michaels.
I’ll leave you to find your own disturbing crotch shots from there.
October 8th, 2009 on 4:40 pm
I am in the same boat Mr Slash. However, I find that the hairier the woman, the easier it is for me to imagine them having sex with me. Alison (being a good looking woman) would have to have a lot more things wrong with her than a bit of hair before I can imagine “relations” possibly happening though. Maybe she’s got freaky, horrifying mutant toes or something… Yeah, that should do the trick…
October 8th, 2009 on 5:32 pm
that camera’s resolution is just amazing. You can count how many hairs she has on her face.
October 8th, 2009 on 5:33 pm
actually you can’t, there are too many.
October 8th, 2009 on 7:57 pm
From the first picture you can see that she has quite downy thighs.
Also, a boob-mole that is photoshopped out in all the other pictures.
October 8th, 2009 on 8:02 pm
Picture 6 is definitely not coherent, in terms of size, shape, and texture with
http://www.ukresistance.co.uk/2009/02/pretend-lara-croft-extends-pretending.html
Even the mole she had on the left one has disappeared. What did they do the real one ? Does she sound changed to her familiars ? Hurry up, guys, the real one may be in danger…
October 8th, 2009 on 8:30 pm
You cant hide a push-up bra in a bikini, that’s why.
October 8th, 2009 on 11:32 pm
http://www.ukresistance.co.uk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Alison_Carroll-UHQ_Pictures_005.jpg
What did they shop out near her lip in this photo, do you think?
October 9th, 2009 on 7:31 am
[…] This post was Twitted by gamea […]
October 9th, 2009 on 2:29 pm
@Pod
That’s probably to hide a stain left over from some intense “contract negotiations” with an Eidos executive.
October 10th, 2009 on 12:47 pm
[…] via ukresistance […]